Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jeff Winston
Of course there isn't. There's no principle that supports having a President instead of a Prime Minister, either.

Go on... It sounds like you are learning.

So freaking what? We changed some things and kept a bunch of others. The definition of terms in the Constitution, as told to us by Framer Alexander Hamilton and by the US Supreme Court, is to be found in the English common law. "Natural born" means what it always meant.

We threw out the parts incompatible with Independent subjects , such as the feudal based law of Liege-Lord bondage as expressed in the Jus Soli principle.

Unfortunately, a bunch of English trained lawyers inadvertently brought it back.

As for the rest of it, for a while we denied our US citizens the right to expatriate just like the English did.

Resolved by statute sometime in the mid 19th century, but Many of the founders are on record as recognizing such a right. Probably it was those same English Trained lawyers who were mucking up the right of expatriation as well. It certainly sounds like their interpretation of the law.

226 posted on 05/13/2013 2:50:29 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp
We threw out the parts incompatible with Independent subjects , such as the feudal based law of Liege-Lord bondage as expressed in the Jus Soli principle.

We threw out liege-lord bondage. We didn't throw out the Jus Soli principle, which says simply that those born in a country are members of that country. Has nothing to do with servitude. Has to do with who is, and who isn't, a member of that particular country.

229 posted on 05/13/2013 3:14:36 PM PDT by Jeff Winston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson