Again, "citizenship at birth" is NOT the same as "natural born citizenship." The Court ruling in Rogers v Bellei demonstrates this conclusively. First of all, Rogers v. Bellei doesn't "demonstrate that conclusively." The case affirmed that Congress could set conditions whereby someone born a citizen abroad might LOSE his US citizenship. It NEVER said that such a person, if born a citizen, was NOT a "natural born citizen."
But even if it had...
And now you are creating your own "Wall of Text". For some reason, you think pointing out how many courts got something wrong is going to convince any of us that Numbers=Correct.
So if YOU PERSONALLY like a particular court decision, why, that "proves" your own claims "CONCLUSIVELY."
If somebody ELSE produces a DOZEN court cases that say you're completely full of sh*t, why, THOSE court cases are all BAD. Those court cases are all WRONG. They don't count for anything.
Once again you show all of FreeRepublic your double standard. Once again you show what a 100% hypocrite and fraud you are.
First of all, Rogers v. Bellei doesn't "demonstrate that conclusively." The case affirmed that Congress could set conditions whereby someone born a citizen abroad might LOSE his US citizenship. It NEVER said that such a person, if born a citizen, was NOT a "natural born citizen." People who are not complete fools understand that the one condition is a consequence of the other, without it having to be explicitly spelled out for them. Of course YOU don't see it. Here's a new word for you A-X-I-O-M-A-T-I-C.
You also further overlook the fact that congress "set the condition" of birth. They had the authority to set the condition as 6 months after birth, had they so chose. The issue is that they SET conditions, making it non-natural.
So if YOU PERSONALLY like a particular court decision, why, that "proves" your own claims "CONCLUSIVELY."
No, it just means THAT court got it right. Nice to see you admitting that some courts don't agree with your theory.
If somebody ELSE produces a DOZEN court cases that say you're completely full of sh*t, why, THOSE court cases are all BAD. Those court cases are all WRONG. They don't count for anything.
Garbage in, Garbage out. Court decisions based on bad or misinterpreted precedent will always be garbage. Most modern courts fall into this category.
Once again you show all of FreeRepublic your double standard. Once again you show what a 100% hypocrite and fraud you are.
Poor straw-man. Jeff just beats him mercilessly.
