[HawkHogan]

Jeff has already made a thoroughly supported case against the birthers. He’s done a ton of research, cited case law, law journals, et all. It doesn’t matter.

[ObligedFriend]

“infants wheresoever born, whose father, if living, or otherwise, whose mother was, a citizen at the time of their birth,

Shall be deemed citizens of this commonwealth, until they relinquish that character in manner as herein after expressed:

Thomas Jefferson May 1779

[ObligedFriend]

http://www.screedofmomus.info/2012/06/stop-william-l-bryan.html

[DiogenesLamp]

Jeff has already made a thoroughly supported case against the birthers. He’s done a ton of research, cited case law, law journals, et all. It doesn’t matter.

Jeff gets his @$$ handed to him every time I encounter him. I just finished pointing out to him that his beloved "Wong Kim Ark" decision was made by the same court which gave us the Infamous "Plessy v Ferguson" decision. (Separate but Equal)

I have now asked him if his Infallible Wong court is also infallible on Plessy, and of course i've gotten the usual caterwauling and back tracking.

Jeff just puts up a wall of nonsense which is so large that nobody bothers to read it, they just figure that if he posted all that crap, it must be true or something. Get him down into the details and it comes apart like a cheap suit.

So, if Jeff is supposedly correct, where did this come from then?

Black and White, Published in 1817 and based on the Work of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court at the behest of the Pennsylvania State Legislature.

Oh, but you study con law or something. Well you got the "con" part right anyway.