Replies

That’s because the idiots afreed to let her “testify” without swearing her in.

Statements not made under oath are NOT testimony.

5 posted on 05/09/2013 4:07:12 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)

What good is testimony when it is not under oath? Please inform me.

16 posted on 05/09/2013 4:22:16 PM PDT by The_Media_never_lie (Actually, they lie when it suits them! The crooked MS media must be defeated any way it can be done!)

I do not think that they could have compelled her with a subpoena at that point. I think only a “Special Investigative Committee”... appointed by boehner... has that power. At least that is how I understood Mark Levin yesterday. They probably had to agree that none of the demons had to be put under oath. They knew that she would lie so that when they put her under oath... she will have to decide whether she will lie again or whether she will tell the truth and condemn herself with the truth. Either way... and I have no idea what will happen... but I do think that any plan that she had for another run at the presidency... is finished regardless.

LLS

25 posted on 05/09/2013 4:41:20 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794