Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Para-Ord.45

Article goes on to say that Dempsy and Panetta were not under oath either.

Democrats are never held to account for any wrongdoing.


4 posted on 05/09/2013 4:06:51 PM PDT by penelopesire (TIME FOR OBAMA TO ANSWER FOR BENGHAZI UNDER OATH!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: penelopesire

Well, this certainly explains their lackadaisical attitude towards the whole thing.

I am hurling.


8 posted on 05/09/2013 4:08:16 PM PDT by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: penelopesire
Hillary, Dempsey, and Panetta were not under oath
~~~~~~~~

Infuriating! Above the law!
~~~~~~~~

Perjury and lying to Congress are two different crimes. Perjury, defined under 18 U.S.C. § 1621, requires violation of an oath.

The crime of making a false statement to Congress, defined under 18 U.S.C. § 1001, covers lying about or concealing a "a material fact" in "any investigation or review, conducted pursuant to the authority of any committee, subcommittee, commission or office of the Congress, consistent with applicable rules of the House or Senate."

The difference is subtle but significant. A witness testifying under oath is under a greater obligation to tell the truth right down to what he or she believes it to be.

A witness merely testifying to a committee of Congress without taking an oath may not subjectively believe what he or she is saying but will probably escape punishment, so long as he or she does not "knowingly and willfully" misrepresent or cover up a material fact.

15 posted on 05/09/2013 4:19:57 PM PDT by thouworm (DEMOGOGUE: leader who makes use of prejudices, false claims and promises to gain power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson