Posted on 05/09/2013 3:59:46 PM PDT by Para-Ord.45
Wednesday's testimony on the Benghazi terror attacks by State Department whistleblowers before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform contradicted several statements by then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in testimony before House and Senate committees in January. However, while Clinton may have misled Congress in her testimony, she likely did not commit perjury because she never actually testified under oath.
Video recordings of Clinton's Jan. 23 testimony before the House Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Senate Foreign Relations Committee suggest that she was never sworn in.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
She will never he held criminally. Only politically. Doesn’t matter if she was under oath.
US Congress = Theater Of The Absurd
That depends on what the meaning of “is” is.
Bring her back (subpoena) and make sure she’s under oath. Ask the same questions and more. She’ll lie — guaranteed.
Judge Andrew Napolitano: Lying to congress carries the same criminal liability and the same punishment as lying under oath to congress.
Hillary has lied all her life, it just comes naturally for her to continue, I’m sure she actually believes her lies as well.
BUT ‘What difference does it make’?
The GOP would rather have a campaign issue, than making someone pay a price. Stupid not to put these Rats under oath. The GOP is a bunch of morons.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.