I’m not asking your opinion.
You in 376 agree that 301(a) does not declare an individual to be a natural born citizen.
You know that Article II specifies natural born citizen.
You know the law you cite does not support your claim. Focus on the law as written. It specifies “citizen”. It is a naturalization statute. What if this statute did not exist?
It doesn't declare them to be citizens of the state they live in, either.
But if they are US citizens, then they are also citizens of the State they live in.
So it says they're a US citizen. It doesn't explicitly state that they are a STATE citizen. But by implication, as long as they actually live in a State, they are.
And if they are BORN US citizens, then that almost certainly makes them "NATURAL BORN" citizens, and eligible to be President.
But go on. Ignore all the stuff that's going on that's the really important stuff, and the stuff on which people might actually make a difference. You could be calling your Congressman and demanding an independent special prosecutor to look into the Obama Adminstration's various abuses of power.
But no. You'd rather waste people's time on a stupid fantasy without any basis in history or law, and without the slightest hope of doing any good whatsoever.