[DiogenesLamp]

No irrelevant weeds here, except for the fact that you posted this passage and tried to claim it supported your argument in the first place.

The Fact that it says "Son of a Freeholder" pretty much screws your argument. You see, according to YOUR theory, that passage shouldn't exist.

The Fact that it was created by James Wilson And Benjamin Franklin is also a serious blow to your theory. They were both delegates to the Constitutional Convention.

[Jeff Winston]

The Fact that it says "Son of a Freeholder" pretty much screws your argument. You see, according to YOUR theory, that passage shouldn't exist.

No, it doesn't. Once again, you spin absolute BS.

Nowhere does it say that only "sons of freeholders" are citizens.

You're an idiot.

But I repeat myself.