“I didnt ask for a link. Your inability to read makes your attempt to persuade even shakier than before.”
You said: Weve already discussed Purpura elsewhere. The courts claims are not backed up by any legal citations, while the principle Im talking about was brought up first in Shanks v. Dupont, affirmed in U.S. v. Rhodes and then affirmed again by U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark.
I provided a link to the judge’s ruling in Purpura and his citations of both Minor v. Happersett and US v. Wong Kim Ark.
See? I CAN read after all!
No, actually you can’t read. Again, I didn’t ask for a link. Copy and paste the actual citations. I’m not hunting for whatever it is you think was cited. Your inability or refusal to do this makes your claim less and less credible.