Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Yo-Yo

Sorry, I found it. You are correct. I word searched for “revolver” in the laws and did not see it. Searching for “category” to me to it.

That should be removed, in my opinion as well.


8 posted on 05/08/2013 6:59:39 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: thackney; Paine in the Neck; grobdriver
So I stand (partially) corrected. So if you qualify with a revolver, you must wait for your renewal class to qualify with a semi-auto before you can carry.

To me that's still a little too nanny-state to me. You are being taught when and when not to use deadly force, you are being taught the moral and legal consequences of carrying concealed, you are being taught where you can and cannot carry, and you must pass a 250 round course of fire.

After all that, does it really matter if you qualified with a revolver and two years later you decide to buy a Glock?

You could qualify with a Ruger Mark III and be licensed to carry a .50AE Desert Eagle, but if you qualify with a Smith & Wesson Model 19 .357 Magnum you can't carry a Ruger SR22P?

11 posted on 05/08/2013 7:10:13 AM PDT by Yo-Yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson