Someone...anyone...
Please help get this question to the appropriate person who can respond. I know many of you have great contacts in the media and politics and it seems someone whould be asking this question. Thank you from all of us who want the truth about Benghazi.
What I can never understand about the Administration’s argument that “there was not enough time to send help,” IS...how did they know how long the attack was going to last? Did they think it would be over in 2 hours, 3, 4...what were they thinking when they made the decision not to send anyone? It lasted 7 hours...did they already know it was going to be a 7 hour attack and so they didn’t bother?
Really...if they knew it would take several hours to deploy military assistance...why didn’t they do so right away? They could always have called them back.
But to say there was not enough time indicates that somehow they already knew when the attack was going to end – and that it would end before any military assistance could arrive.
Of course, afterward it has been convenient for their agenda for them to say that there wasn’t enough time to get there. That sounds be realistic at first. But it did not happen that way, as they want us to believe.
Bottom line is: They had no way of knowing (or did they?) how long those terrorists were going to rage in the streets, or what they were going to do.
So to say that their decision not to send them was because - there wasn’t enough time to, at least, deploy them, is just a smokescreen because they had no intentions of sending help.
And that is a point that NO ONE seems to be taking apart. Everyone in the liberal media, every Democrat keeps repeating the “Not enough time” talking point – but no one is asking Obama, or Hillary, or anyone - “JUST HOW MUCH TIME DID YOU THINK THE TERRORISTS WERE GOING TO CONTINUE…HOW WOULD YOU KNOW WHEN THEY WERE GOING TO STOP - HOW DID YOU KNOW HOW MUCH TIME WOULD BE NEEDED BEFORE IT ENDED?”
Please, please help to get someone to ask this question - it is the only logical one to stop the Democrats in their tracks - because they CANNOT answer it. Unless, of course, there was some “arrangement” that has not been revealed - and they don’t want to reveal...and because...they cannot be certain when it was going to end...then there was NO reason not to have sent help!!!
The only thing to understand is that was just a CYA for cowards.
"No man left behind" is more than an Army Ranger credo it's the character of America.
Your point is HUGE.
How could anyone say that “there wasn’t enough time” to send help unless they knew exactly how long a terrorist attack was going to take??
By their very statement, we should have lost not one first responder in the towers on 9/11/01!!!! Clearly there was “not enough time” on that day.