One can clearly see a pattern here, in this trial...
When it’s an (R)...there is actual questioning. They aren’t giving any kind of spiel or talking points, they are just basically asking questions of the witness.
When it’s a (D)...all it is is talking points and personal stories....a bunch of BS waste of time
And this POS Mr. Connolly, what a bloviating windbag he is...
Rep. Duncan (R-TN) raises question of why key witnesses with first-hand knowledge were not interviewed for ARB!1
says only if one “didn’t want a complete report” could interviews leave out such direct witnesses!!
It’s the same at every hearing I’ve seen