Posted on 05/08/2013 6:00:25 AM PDT by kristinn
It is important to also understand that the protest-turned-riot at the Cairo embassy had little or nothing to do with the "Youtube video" either.
Brian Lilley: The MSM is lying about the muslim riots (video news report)
Interviews on the streets of Cairo. 'Video' had nothing to do with protests and attack.
These can be charge up to 300 times. But they hold the charge for usage up to 4 hours or so. I have used the same ones for three months and no problem.
More testimony needed. Ya think?
Washington knew about Stevens traveling to Benghazi as early as August 22!!!
And money/funding was not the issue as per today’s testimony.
Their Facebook page had terrorist posts on it.
or edging closer to the Ambassador and those investigating this operation had to be taken down to protect obama / hillary / panetta.
Congress controls C-Span (to some extent).
Ditto ... no money funding issues for security.
COULD WOODS AND DOHERTY BEEN SAVED HAD OBAMA ORDERED FIGHTER AIRCRAFT FLYOVER INTO LIBYA?
Obama knew and approved. If obama did not know ... why not?
That’s the best question. Just whose agenda was being followed from start to finish? I want someone to say it out loud.
To Doug Collins, I know the answer, DENIAL is the only plan.
I’m so frustrated, got called out today and missed the majority of this. Dang it.
Exactly. I sent him a quick email and told him pretty much exactly that...only maybe not as politely as you just did. He’s really lost the plot, and it’s getting worse. He obviously had no clue what was going on with the hearings today. Worse that that, he didn’t seem to care.
“These can be charge up to 300 times”
No way mine do that.
That is why we have (apparently) just Republicans left.
Maloney (D-NY) seems to be annoyed about this, and tried earlier to get the Republicans to yield to a question...
I’m so sorry for you, too, but CSPAN will replay it and it’ll be in their Library.
Since I had to miss the majority of this today, are you telling me that question hasn’t been asked????
Looking back at President Obama’s speech to the United Nations General Assembly in September 2012 in the light of today’s hearings. While Obama claimed he said it was an act of terror in the Rose Garden the day after the attack he said this to the UN General Assembly two weeks later. Was Obama out of the loop? Rather did he intentionally deceive?
“That is what we saw play out the last two weeks, as a crude and disgusting video sparked outrage throughout the Muslim world.”
Obama’s utopian view of the world at the time. Some think Obama is too wrap up in believing his own fantasies? I think not!
“And it is because of the progress Ive witnessed that after nearly four years as President, I am hopeful about the world we live in. The war in Iraq is over, and our troops have come home. We have begun a transition in Afghanistan, and America and our allies will end our war on schedule in 2014. Al Qaeda has been weakened and Osama bin Laden is no more. Nations have come together to lock down nuclear materials, and America and Russia are reducing our arsenals. Ive seen hard choices made from Naypyidaw to Cairo to Abidjan to put more power in the hands of citizens.”
“Stephens in Benghazi because Hillary wanted a permanent constituent post there. Edging ever closer to possible gun running to Syrian rebels.”
What I find odd about that is Hillary is trying to meet a Sept 30 budget deadline for this, BUT she ALSO withdraws security forces by 2/3rds, IIRC?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.