Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: grundle

If they were homosexual the group homes would be falling over themselves to set them up and the zero would call telling them how brave they are to be “so retatded and yet...”[snark]

It does bring up the point: who actually married them and should they have done so? They are obviously incapable of living on their own, so how is this contract valid?
Fact is that they are married. They should not be denied what they can enjoy of each other. It should not take too many $$ resources to accomodate them.


5 posted on 05/08/2013 3:47:25 AM PDT by Adder (No, Mr. Franklin, we could NOT keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Adder

But should a nonprofit group home set up to accommodate only single and single-sex clients be forced to accommodate a married couple?


7 posted on 05/08/2013 3:54:36 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Adder

I have never heard of a mentally retarded person being homosexual. They are much too smart for that.


10 posted on 05/08/2013 4:07:01 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Adder

the issue must be production of children. If children are produced what does the group home do?


37 posted on 05/08/2013 8:32:23 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson