If they were homosexual the group homes would be falling over themselves to set them up and the zero would call telling them how brave they are to be “so retatded and yet...”[snark]
It does bring up the point: who actually married them and should they have done so? They are obviously incapable of living on their own, so how is this contract valid?
Fact is that they are married. They should not be denied what they can enjoy of each other. It should not take too many $$ resources to accomodate them.
But should a nonprofit group home set up to accommodate only single and single-sex clients be forced to accommodate a married couple?
I have never heard of a mentally retarded person being homosexual. They are much too smart for that.
the issue must be production of children. If children are produced what does the group home do?