Posted on 05/07/2013 6:38:18 PM PDT by servo1969
A Rushism for the ages:
"It's obvious that Obama's priorities are disastrous. It could well be that Obama himself is among the low-information voters. He could be one of them. . . . It's like Mr. Bongino said. "Where's the competence? I haven't seen a lot of competence, frankly." You want to know the truth? Obama has yet to demonstrate that he is particularly smart or competent in things that matter. He certainly doesn't learn from history or his own mistakes. I mean, how smart do you have to be, how informed do you have to be to be a committed leftist? You don't have to be smart at all! You have to be a follower."
I've always posited that "Marxism is easy" for the intellectually challenged follower types. "Cool man, utopia dude." . . plus their passive-dependent personalities love the nanny state.
It goes without saying this has to change or we are doomed.
Stevens was begging for more security for months BEFORE the attack,he wrote in his own diary he thought he was going to die,his answer from the State dept. Was to have more security removed. You can’t find the answers by isolating just the attack,the months leading to the attack give you the key to the whole mess,that is why the first question should be is why we’re WE running guns to Syria from Benghazi? Rush is great but he is missing the boat on this one. He is right that is was political,but the reason is far more that Obama said al-Qaeda is on the run,the media would bury that wit h no problem,running guns and jihadis that had killed Americans to Syria through Bengahzi is a lot harder to recover from and Avery good reason to let people die
Meadow muffins, this whole thing consists of supplying arms to Al Qaeda (Muslim Brotherhood).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.