Because in that decision the Supremes specifically said Congress was free to authorize interstate sales tax collection if they so desired.
The decision only forbade the states from acting unilaterally without the express permission of Congress.
[[Because in that decision the Supremes specifically said Congress was free to authorize interstate sales tax collection if they so desired]]
i was more talking about the health care ruling where basically John Robert’s claim is that the supreme court is NOT supposed to ‘protect peopel from bad choices’ and that if they don’t like their current choice, why then they could simply ‘vote them out i nnext election’ (Although irreversible damage will have been done and hte peopel are pwoerless to do anythign about it- AND the supreme court makes rulings ll the time that ‘protect the people from bad chocies’
John Roberts essentially gave the presidente unfettered power to do as he pleases by claimign it wasn’t the court’s job to protect hte peopel- ElPresidente swore up and down his healthcare law wasn’t a tax, yet suppsoedly it is unconstitutional to force anyone to purchase something agaisnt hteir will (when it comes down to it, you don’t HAVE to buy anything- or at least that’s how it was before the HC law- you didn’t need insurance for vehicles[you coudl simply choose not to drive] you didn’t have to have life insurance accident insuarance, etc etc etc- now all of a sudden the surpeme court decides it’s just a-ok for the gubmint ot FORCE peopel to purchase soemthign or else pay a fine