Don't they already have to accept the marriages of polygamist countries when in those countries?
You also support gay marriage and polygamy as long as a Mosque or church somewhere does,
I didn't say that -- If you're incapable of comprehending that some things are not with the state's purview then discussing theology or religion with you is a waste of time because you would be incapable of it.
I guess atheists are flat out of luck.
They already are.
So you do support homosexuals in the military, homosexuals adopting, etc. which is the homosexual agenda.
That's stupid; a homosexual could already do all of that for all of American history: albeit they had best shut-the-hell-up about being homosexual.
The "Homosexual agenda" is about preferential treatment because of their homosexuality, and using the state to define marriage to include the "homosexual lifestyle.
Man, that is gibberish, absolute nonsense, you just flat refuse to communicate, now you are sounding like a true libertarian, slipping and sliding avoiding and evading, getting sillier and sillier and denying you support what you keep supporting on the thread.
The American military does not recognize polygamy for it’s soldiers, you ignored telling us how atheists are to marry if you only want Mosques and churches to do marriage, and you seem to think that homosexuality has always been open and legal in the military, it hasn’t.
You do want to not protect marriage, to allow homosexuals in the military, allow them to adopt and not discriminate in custody cases, the homosexual agenda.