That didn’t make any sense, but it was childish.
You must understand what I was asking you don’t you? I guess that I should just point it out rather than ask, you keep avoiding what we have to assume about your libertarian support of the homosexual agenda, you support homosexualizing the military, adoption and child custody.
Conservatives think you are wrong, lefties love that you support them.
I've already answered your question.
You must understand what I was asking you don’t you? I guess that I should just point it out rather than ask, you keep avoiding what we have to assume about your libertarian support of the homosexual agenda, you support homosexualizing the military, adoption and child custody.
You refuse to read what I've said -- I do not support it [the "homosexual agenda"], if I did then I would have said it.
What I did say is that the government should deal with people via the law, and that the law should be concerned with actions...
Homosexual[-ity] isn't a verb, and therefore shouldn't be the law's purview, and by that attribute shouldn't be the concern of government.
[Murder, perjure, steal are verbs and therefore actions and therefore possibly the concern of the law.]
In short homosexuality isn't a problem that can or should be addressed by the government, it should be addressed by the Church.