Replies

“She has become too polarizing”

What is meant by “polarizing?” It means only that a person of principle inspires opposition to the leftist agenda. That’s all. It is a bad thing only from the perspective of the left, and no one should have the slightest concern for their perspective. When a RINO uses the term, it just means that he is in a snit because principled opposition is interfering with his attempts to give the leftists their way.

We should be working for *more* polarization, not less. We should be drawing a line in the sand: “Demonrats and other scum please move to the other side of that line.”

The demonrats well know that it is polarization that wins elections, which is why they both practice it and try to convince their enemies that it is a bad thing. When one accepts that premise, one allows the demonrats to select Stupid Party candidates by eliminating all that the rats find “too polarizing.”

“A leader knows how to bring people together.”

A leader also knows how to recognize the enemy. A leader knows that Evil always attacks Good, because that is the nature of Evil. A leader knows that one must not bring Evil into the tent, and that one cannot bring people together with Evil without becoming evil.

All leftist thought, from the limousine liberalism of a George Clooney to the murderous horrors of Mao, Stalin, and Pol Pot, is of and from Satan. Leftism is a contaminant in the human cognosphere, not a natural component of it.

Satan is smarter than we are, and he never sleeps. Those over whom he has the most influence are like maniacally evil energizer demons.

It is important to remember that this is a different “left” and “right” than that in common use today. This distinction is not between monarchists and advocates of mob rule, nor even between idiots taken in by socialist drivel and those who know better. It is a distinction between “closer to God” and “closer to the Earl of Hell,” and is independent of the personal beliefs of anyone concerned. A Stupid Party imbecile could fancy himself an atheist and still be to the right of a demon-ridden Evil Party Messalina who claimed the label of Catholic without holding or supporting Catholic beliefs.

Each member of the Evil Party is a loathsome, crawling, traitorous, congenitally dishonest, amoral, sociopathic, gun-fearing, pansy-assed, chicken-choking, Starbucks-sipping, godless, America-hating, degenerate, pickle-smooching, liberal-Nazi fool. At the very best, through stupidity or moral confusion, they are allied with and support such scoundrels.

There can be—there must be—no “bringing together.” The alternatives are victory or death, as has always been the case.

“Sarah Palin divides.”

Such discernment is one trait of a good leader. A good leader makes one thing perfectly clear: he does not stand with or even tolerate scumbags. If that means that the scumbags don’t vote for him, well, they weren’t going to vote for him anyway, so nothing lost—but much gained.

If a candidate doesn’t drive the leftards into a slavering, convulsing, howling, puking, chewing-their-own-lips-off, full-blown “Exorcist” seizure, that candidate is not morally fit for office.

It is the leftards and their loathsome catamites in the media, academia, the judiciary, and almost every other walk of life who “divide.” Agree with them or you are their enemy, and they will stop at nothing to destroy you. Governor Palin has made it plain that she does not agree with them, that she gladly accepts that she is their enemy, and so they howl that she divides rather than unites (disagrees with them), that she is a hater (disagrees with them), that she is a charismatic pole around which their opposition can gather (disagrees with them), and that for all these reasons she is “unelectable.”

Really? We’re going to let the leftards disqualify her as a candidate because she disagrees with them?

If we do, we deserve to ride the boxcars to the death camps. And don’t think that isn’t what they have in mind.