Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: muawiyah
North Dakota has limits ~ first, how many peeps can deal with the climate.

My problem with the statement was it sounded like we needed to establish government control to keep it rural.

39 posted on 05/02/2013 5:44:39 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: thackney
The gub'mnt already surveyed the land, divided it, tried to sell it ~ some of the railroad land still isn't sold ~ and then planted thermonuclear warheads in the ground all over the place.

That doesn't even count running off the Indians on behalf of the goldminers!

Gub'mnt doing something else to the Dakota country is probably in the cards but keeping it rural is the least of our concerns.

Think about all of our oil being located in a region we've made an attractive ICBM target!

41 posted on 05/02/2013 6:17:24 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson