Somewhat agree.
Certainly the bombing was scarier than this spectacle of marshal law. Certainly observing on TV the explosions was far more traumatizing than having law enforcement, those entrusted with the Socratic Noble Lie, order citizens confined to their own home awaiting the moment those incorruptible representatives of government come to level their automatic weapons at our fellow citizen’s mid-section and order them to the street.
Some might say that in this nation, the United States of America, the Constitution forbids this sort of thing in order to restrain the power of the government over the people. I say, “Posh!” Those who wrote those dusty documents never considered the horror of terrorist bombers. If they had, they would have made exceptions to the Fourth Amendment to say specifically that should it be the case that a terror bomber were suspected of hiding in some mile square area inhabited by US citizens, these citizens should be subject to incarceration and warrantless searches at gunpoint.
Our founders knew that the people of American and their Government would always be different from all other cultures of the world, forever. Such things could never, ever lead to events as those that happened to Armenians in 1915, Ukrainians in the 1930s, or the Jews in the 1940s. Never.
BOSTON STORNG! Good on them for their continued silence. What right does this upstart Kentuckian have to his outrage?
The NappyOne