Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Steve Peacock

Interesting article, thanks for posting.

My reaction is mixed. On the one hand, I find this kind of thing interesting, the blurring of the line between military and specialist civilians.

On the other hand, I can’t help but wonder that there is money to pay contractors but no money to pay to maintain this capability in-house so to speak.

I always wonder if there are other considerations. Maybe contracting them allows the commander to have direct control without competing with other commands, or something. Or the owner of the company is well-connected. Or this is a way of keeping skilled people in the game and not losing their expertise after they have officially retired. Or some combination of the above.

I also find this article interesting because Africa is going to be the next theater for the Great Game. Al Qaeda, Chinese, you name it, we’ll all be there.


3 posted on 04/29/2013 3:26:13 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: marron

Cause we’re cheaper in the long run...and there’s LOTS of expertise after the last decade with guys that have retired or left the military.


4 posted on 04/29/2013 4:23:09 PM PDT by sandboxshooter (Iraq, Afghanistan, War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson