To: CMB_polarization
I’m not sure which is more dangerous: Flying over Syria, or flying in a Russian aircraft.
10 posted on
04/29/2013 2:31:35 PM PDT by
EternalVigilance
(Life, liberty, property, family, RKBA, sovereignty, security, borders, independence, the oath.)
To: EternalVigilance
But both? Those passengers had some ‘nads.
13 posted on
04/29/2013 2:33:41 PM PDT by
txhurl
To: EternalVigilance; txhurl
According to another article it was an Airbus A320.
15 posted on
04/29/2013 2:39:30 PM PDT by
BBell
(And Now for Something Completely Different)
To: EternalVigilance
Let’s see... chartered Russian aircraft, flying over Syria, shot at by 2 missiles AND missed (airliners carry counter-measures?). Sounds like someone had inside info that asshat assad was being given safe haven.
21 posted on
04/29/2013 2:51:08 PM PDT by
X-spurt
(Republic of Texas, Come and Take It!)
To: EternalVigilance
I’ve done both. It’s the boozy Russian pilot at the controls, with the Italian REO, and Chi-com flight engineer that’ll get ya’.
25 posted on
04/29/2013 3:05:57 PM PDT by
PowderMonkey
(WILL WORK FOR AMMO)
To: EternalVigilance
I’m not sure which is more dangerous: Flying over Syria, or flying in a Russian aircraft.You owe me a new keyboard!
32 posted on
04/29/2013 4:41:59 PM PDT by
Gritty
(The Constitution's purpose is to insulate personal freedom from a lust for power-Judge A. Napolitano)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson