I did not skip to the end. I read it all to this point. Please clarify as to what the actual disruption is? Is stating an opinion that certain language is inappropriate a disruption? How so?
Or is it the multiple posts of personal attack, rather than reasoned disagreement?
I see it as the latter. How about you?
So you are saying calling us cultist is reasoned discourse? You are saying that the well known PDS phenomenon is to be accepted/promoted and allowed to flourish? you are saying we must be as PC as a Birkenstock wearing OWSer?
That BS and half baked nitpicking based on personal hangups should rule the day unopposed and derail discussion?
Because that sure sounds like what you are saying to me.
Am I alone here folks?
Bottom line. Most Palin ‘cultists’ are fed up with PDS and jump at the first sign. Blame the abundance of it on FR for the hair trigger response.