Posted on 04/26/2013 3:14:02 AM PDT by lowbridge
But promised and guaranteed by the U.S. government in their treaties, which can’t legally be abrogated without mutual consent.
still totally unConstitutional, huge contradiction
Here's a good test of that 'sovereignty': Can you manufacture a full-auto machine gun there?
Trivia time.
Question: How many U.S. government agencies or departments are taking care of American Indians [aka Native Americans] on their reservations besides the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA)?
Answer: Sixteen, in addition to the BIA (for a total of 17).
If there was ever a case of blatant waste, fraud, and abuse, it exists here. The U.S. government would save a lot of money though combining programs, eliminating duplication, and trimming the fat from this mess. But, we couldn’t do THAT could we? Nope. Doing anything this logical completely befuddles the morons that populate Washington, DC.
No, it's not...
Article I, Section 8, Clause 3
"[The Congress shall have Power] To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian tribes."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.