Again, no. The court cases I cited {Warden v. Hayden, 387 U.S. 294, United States v. Santana, 427 U.S. 38, United States v. Lopez, 989 F.2d 24 (1st Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 872, 114 S. Ct. 201, 126 L. Ed. 2d 158 [1993]); and United States v. Sewell, 942 F.2d 1209 [7th Cir. 1991]} all required specific evidence of exigent circumstances at a specific address. There is no general exception for exigent circumstances in an entire neighborhood, and I hope no one other than you and the Boston PD or FBI HRT will accept the idea that this created an acceptable precedent.
I'm sure there are a lot of people like you - see if you can drum up a class-action suit, then let me know how well you triumphed!
Bye