Posted on 04/25/2013 8:45:57 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
As travellers nationwide are learning, the White House has decided to express its dislike of the sequesterotherwise known as modestly smaller governmentby choosing to cut basic air traffic control services. We wrote about this human- rights violation on Tuesday in "Flight Delays as Political Strategy," but the story gets worse the closer we look.
Start with the Federal Aviation Administration, better known as the Postal Service without the modern technology. Flyers directly fund two-thirds of the FAA's budget through 17 airline taxes and feesabout 20% of the cost of a $300 domestic ticket, up from 7% in the 1970s. Yet now the White House wants to make this agency that can't deliver what passengers are supposedly paying for even more dysfunctional.
Ponder this logic, if that's the right word: The sequester cuts about $637 million from the FAA, which is less than 4% of its $15.9 billion 2012 budget, and it limits the agency to what it spent in 2010. The White House decided to translate this 4% cut that it has the legal discretion to avoid into a 10% cut for air traffic controllers. Though controllers will be furloughed for one of every 10 working days, four of every 10 flights won't arrive on time.
The FAA projects the delays will rob one out of every three travellers of up to four hours of their lives waiting at the major hubs. Congress passed a law in 2009 that makes such delays illegal, at least if they are the responsibility of an airline. Under President Obama's "passenger bill of rights," the carriers are fined millions of dollars per plane that sits on the tarmac for more than three hours. But sauce for the goose is apparently an open bar for the FAA gander.
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
Yes, the 2014 elections. Wall Street Journal doesn’t go there, but it is obvious that the administration intends the Dem victory to come out of traveler hides and pockets, among other places. Despicable. Obama hates the citizens of the United States. How how how did this happen!!!
This is a cut on the rising new base line [ which is higher than last year ] ?
They are spending more this year than last year [ new green programs that were started this year that did not exist last year ] ?
The real cut is closer to a one percent for this fiscal year as the larger number is over a ten year period ?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.