Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mikelets456

Miranda WARNING.

The rights were always there, the decision was that the police had to WARN you that you had those rights before they started asking you questions.

The decision conveyed no rights. It compelled the police to WARN you that you had the right to not talk to them - which is ALWAYS a good idea.


9 posted on 04/25/2013 8:07:09 AM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: allmendream
"The rights were always there, the decision was that the police had to WARN you that you had those rights before they started asking you questions."

Up to the point where they say "you are under arrest," they can ask you anything they want, and your answers can indeed be used against you in court. Miranda begins with the specific wording "You are under arrest." No arrest? No need to Mirandize. So this judge supposedly shows up in the perp's hospital room to Mirandize him? Who arrested him? Obviously not the FBI.
51 posted on 04/25/2013 8:47:42 AM PDT by PowderMonkey (WILL WORK FOR AMMO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: allmendream
The rights were always there, the decision was that the police had to WARN you

There it is. Everyone knows that. He knew he had the right to keep his mouth shut but was cooperating anyway. The question I want answered is what did the judge and entourage tell him to make him shut up. Them waltzing in there wasn't because the judge had a wild hair to do so. They were there upon someone's orders. I suspect the Miranda was an excuse to relay a message to get hussein's muzzy brother to keep quiet. I also want to know when he was officially arrested. There isn't a hint of indiscretion of him not being read his rights if he wasn't under arrest. Let him tell it all and then arrest and read him his rights.

76 posted on 04/25/2013 9:46:31 AM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: allmendream
"The rights were always there, the decision was that the police had to WARN you that you had those rights before they started asking you questions. The decision conveyed no rights. It compelled the police to WARN you that you had the right to not talk to them - which is ALWAYS a good idea."

THIS bears repeating.

Miranda conveys NO rights. Miranda simply makes one aware of rights one already has as a US citizen!

86 posted on 04/25/2013 10:33:02 AM PDT by sonofagun (Some think my cynicism grows with age. I like to think of it as wisdom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson