He's not even a citizen.
I’m starting to get the impression the Brothers Turdhead were supposed to be suicide bombers.
They didn’t expect anyone to be alive to talk.
Who knows how this sort of thing actually works legally? Can a president or governor instruct a judge or magistrate to go and read someone their Miranda rights? What about separatin of powers?
Or did someone from the Justice Dept. or other federal or state agency have to file something with a court and then get the courts approval and participation?
Nobody simply “waltzes” into a room guarded by the FBI any easier than any of us could simply “waltze” into the White House unannounced. Higher powers permitted this.
That terrorist should have been shot in the boat; he will never be executed for mass murder.
Can you say cluster f^%$?
“Unbelievable” is the new “unexpected.”
I tried to post this as a thread last night, but got frustrated when my attempts to put it in "News/Activism" failed.
Anyway--this is a truly BRAZEN act by the Obama Admin--and I pray it gets the kind of "Fast and Furious" response it deserves!
A( NO!
Did Michelle Obozo visit with the bomber after the judge mirandized him?
Gee, who would ever think that a foreign usurper (enemy combatant) with a forged birth certificate, stolen SSN, fraudulent selective service card with a communist mentor, a domestic terrorist mentor, radical muslim benefactors and CIA directors, gay benefactors, and a lifelong marination radical anti-Americanism could set things in motion that could shock the FBI.
Fast & Furious
22 Navy Seals
Benghazi
Our FBI/SS/DOJ/DOH/etc. are top notch./s
You’d think they would get a clue who they work for now.
Oh wait, they are probably all CAIR members themselves these days.
So much for the hospital being a fortress of security. Whoever it was must have had credentails to get into the room, where did they come from and who signed them?
Who signs the judge’s paycheck?
Is it legal for a Judge to Mirandize someone? Are they considered police or peace officers? Do they carry a badge, and have to qualify with the standard issue firearms to maintain that status? Personally, I think this Judge acted illegally, but then, I could be wrong.
Why did he talk at all in the first place?
Is this the same FBI that was assisting in the ‘fierce’ gun-battle with said suspect at the boat? A suspect that later was found NOT to have a weapon? A suspect that was reported to have attempted suicide with said non-existent weapon? The FBI that knew about these brothers since at least 2009? That FBI? What to believe and who to trust.....
The so-called 48 hour rule is an FBI/LEO created time limit that has never been sanctioned by the courts or congress. Also, the “public safety exception” to Miranda requires an imminent threat to LEO or public safey based upon objective evidence. The exception is not supposed to be used as a license to conduct an unrestrained interrogation that goes beyond the subject matter of the threat. Don’t shoot the messenger.
The so-called 48 hour rule is an FBI/LEO created time limit that has never been sanctioned by the courts or congress. Also, the “public safety exception” to Miranda requires an imminent threat to LEO or public safey based upon objective evidence. The exception is not supposed to be used as a license to conduct an unrestrained interrogation that goes beyond the subject matter of the threat. Don’t shoot the messenger.
One would think hussein was in on this whole thing by the way they act.
islamist that he is, he probably was.
He's not even a citizen.
It looks like everyone on our side has forgotten the 2010 Supreme Court ruling that the police or anyone else like waltzing judges do not have to recite Miranda to suspects.
If perps are ignorant of the 5th Amendment, that's their problems.
Justices Narrow Miranda Rule, June 2, 2010
"Criminal defendants must specifically invoke the right to remain silent under the Miranda rule during questioning to avoid self-incrimination, the Supreme Court said Tuesday.
The vote in the case was 5-4 along ideological lines as the court's conservatives put limits on the rights of suspects.
Under the Miranda rule, derived from the 1966 Supreme Court decision in Miranda v. Arizona, police may not question a suspect who invokes his right to remain silent—and can't use as evidence incriminating statements obtained after the suspect does so.
Review the cases already decided and still to come in the Supreme Court's 2009-2010 term, plus details on the arguments, the court's calendar, and the justices themselves.
In Tuesday's decision, the court ruled that an ambiguous situation would be treated in favor of the police. "
-end snip-