Posted on 04/24/2013 11:02:19 AM PDT by jazusamo
Senate Republicans say Democrats postponed a vote on President Obama's nominee for Labor secretary after they learned that a whistleblower related to a questionable case was invited to testify at a Thursday hearing.
Georgia Republican Johnny Isakson, a member of the panel, had asked Frederick Newell to discuss the involvement of Thomas Perez and the Justice Department in the disposition of several housing discrimination cases in St. Paul, Minn.
Republicans argue that Newell's testimony could have contradicted statements made by Perez, as head of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, at his confirmation hearing last week, an aide told The Hill.
Republicans argue that when Democrats found out about the minority witness they "abruptly canceled" the hearing, according to one Senate aide.
Last week, GOP committee members questioned Perez on his involvement in an agreement made between the Justice Department and city of St. Paul.
House and Senate Republicans argue that Perez brokered an unethical deal in convincing St. Paul officials to drop a Supreme Court appeal that would have had a potentially adverse effect on discrimination cases in exchange for keeping the Justice Department from intervening in two whistleblower cases they say could have brought the U.S. government upward of $200 million in damages.
Last week, the panel's ranking member, Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.), pressed Perez on why he would miss an opportunity to return millions of dollars to U.S. taxpayers by failing to intervene in the cases.
Perez said that, ultimately, the Newell case against St. Paul was dismissed by a court and would not have provided any money to the government.
That was after Justice Department officials determined that the case lacked merit.
Senate Health, Education Labor and Pensions Committee Chairman Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) announced the delay of Thursday's vote until May 8.
On Monday, Alexander sent a letter asking for additional time.
Harkin had initially said he would hold the vote as scheduled, but changed his mind on Wednesday. Republicans say the delay was forced by the recognition that Newell would testify on Thursday.
Still, Harkin said it was a time issue.
“While I continue to believe there are no impediments to Mr. Perez’s confirmation, I am agreeing to postpone his committee vote until May 8th, in order to allow those senators who have asked the time to request additional information they believe they need, and to evaluate his qualifications," Harkin said in a statement to The Hill.
"I am confident they will reach the same conclusion that I have, and that they will join the bipartisan array of business leaders, elected officials, civil rights leaders, and worker advocates that strongly support Mr. Perez’s confirmation,” he added.
Alexander agreed with the decision that more time is needed to, at the very least, get questions answered.
"It was appropriate for the chairman to postpone the markup so that senators could get responses to a number of outstanding questions as we evaluate this nominee," Alexander said in a statement sent to The Hill.
In the letter sent on Monday, Alexander outlined several items that Republicans wanted to clear up before the vote.
The panel's Republicans asked for the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to make available two witnesses for transcribed interviews regarding their involvement in a whistleblower case in which the Justice Department decided not to intervene, the letter said.
They also requested copies of the emails Perez allegedly sent from his personal email account while conducting government business and asked for the Justice Department's inspector general to provide transcripts of interviews gathered during an investigation that resulted in a March 12 report.
In addition, there were about 175 questions sent to Perez by panel members, an aide said.
Perez has strong backing from Democrats, but faces considerable resistance from Senate Republicans, including Sen. David Vitter (R-La.) who is blocking the nomination.
In addition, 42 House Republicans sent a letter to senators last week urging them to vote against Perez, who they argue has "ignored the law when it suited his political agenda."
We had Van Jones and Anita Dunn and Carol Browner and the Sec education guy, but this guy Perez is very possibly the single most dangerous idealogue yet. This guy is viciously and certifiably insane.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.