As far as the point you're trying to make here, it's completely invalid.
Trumbull was clear that Indians born IN THE TRIBES were not subject to the full jurisdiction of the United States. They were PARTIALLY subject to US jurisdiction, because they were on United States land.
That's what the entire "subject to the complete jurisdiction" discussion was all about.
But Trumbull was equally clear that when those "wild Indians" left their tribes, their de facto separate nations, and came to dwell among the white man, in United States society, they BECAME subject to the complete jurisdiction of the United States, and their children born in US society were citizens.
Similarly, the children of British people in Britain were not subject to the complete jurisdiction of the United States. In fact, they weren't subject to the jurisdiction of the United States at all.
But when British people came and lived among us, they became subject to the complete jurisdiction of the United States, just as members of Indian tribes who came and lived among us became subject to our complete jurisdiction.
So I understand the argument you're trying to make here, but it's completely invalid.
Clearly NOT, as U.S. Secretaries of State have CONFIRMED what I've stated. See post 93.