Well, you have convinced me that you believe a police officer is allowed to fire his weapon at someone for little or no reason. Suspicion of being the wrong person apparently is a capital crime now.
You have also convinced me that contemporary news, conglomerated by digesting multiple sources, might possibly be wrong, so no such information should ever be considered factual. After all, the people involved in a situation obviously can’t describe the happenings accurately. Supposition and innuendo after the fact is much better in establishing what happened.
Good luck with those beliefs.
If that's what you've gained from this discussion, I have to question your ability to comprehend English.
You have also convinced me that contemporary news, conglomerated by digesting multiple sources, might possibly be wrong, so no such information should ever be considered factual.
See above, Mortimer.