Did I not clarify it in post 67? Let me repost the relevant part of post 67:
“There was no good excuse for “these” LE officers to fire into the “back” of “this” vehicle. None.”
If you like arguing for arguing’ sake - go for it. You are still wrong.
Words have meanings. When one carelessly posts or posts without thinking through what they mean, they have a tendency to contract foot in mouth disease. Being factual and accurate is a reliable cure.