Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: plain talk

I do not intend to attempt a defense of all police actions that night.

I just think it is silly to expect the cops to know then what we know now.


41 posted on 04/23/2013 5:53:06 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: Sherman Logan

Hindsight is not really needed. They KNEW they were looking for one guy and saw him drive away. They had thousands of cops looking for one skinny guy. Incredible overkill and overreach. If you are saying there was potential for other accomplices and unknowns etc. Of course. That is what police deal with every day and they do with far less than a thousand police army.


51 posted on 04/23/2013 6:04:32 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: Sherman Logan
I just think it is silly to expect the cops to know then what we know now.

And I think it's silly to excuse brutally trampling civil rights under the rubric of "police safety" when they know they have overwhelming force on their side.

If cops what their "safety" guaranteed: go become a hairdresser.

55 posted on 04/23/2013 6:16:16 PM PDT by papertyger (Blessed are the flexible for they shall not be broken....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson