http://thesaurus.com/browse/infamous?s=t
Main Entry: infamous [in-fuh-muhs] Show IPA/ˈɪnfəməs/ Show Spelled Part of Speech: adjective
Definition: shameful, bad in reputation
Synonyms: abominable, atrocious, base, caitiff, contemptible, corrupt, degenerate, despicable, detestable, disgraceful, dishonorable, disreputable, egregious, evil, flagitious, foul, hateful, heinous, ignominious, ill-famed, iniquitous, loathsome, miscreant, monstrous, nefarious, notorious, odious, offensive, opprobrious, outrageous, perverse, questionable, rotten, scandalous, scurvy, shady, shocking, sorry, unhealthy, vicious, vile, villainous, wicked Notes: famous means widely known, renowned, and esteemed while infamous means having an exceedingly bad reputation, notorious
Antonyms: dignified, glorious, good, innocent, moral, perfect, principled, pure, respectable, righteous, virtuous
What are people like this idiot going to do in their spare time once the homos get to play house?
“The lady(boy) doth protest too much, methinks.”
I seriously don’t know who Ayanbadejo is so how are he/she a hero?
As evidenced by the article, Obama guard dog Fx News is unsurprisingly subtly pushing PC interpretations of the Equal Protections Clause (EPC) in Section 1 of the 14th Amendment imo. In fact, the fight against California's Prop. 8 is based on 14A's EPC as evidenced by the fact that the equal protections clause in California's constitution is expressly based on the clause in 14A.
And if some patriots are trembling in their boots because of PC interpretations of the equal protection clauses of federal and state constitutons, its probably because they haven't read the relevant sections of 14A.
More specifically, note that Sec. 2 of 14A actually discriminates on the basis of sex, age and citizenship regardless of the EPC in Sec. 1 of that amendment. So what 14A is really telling us about so-called equal protections is the following. The states can make discriminitory laws based on issues which are not expressly protected by the Constitution, as long as a given states discriminates equally on such issues.
In fact, note that the Supreme Court's Minor v. Happersett case shows us that, regardless of 14A's EPC, the Supreme Court didn't buy Victoria Minor's claim that her citizenship status essentially gave her the right to vote despite a state law that prohibited women from voting.
MINOR V. HAPPERSETT, 1874
But also note that prohibiting voting on the basis of sex was later prohibited with a constitutional amendment.
Getting back to Fx News's constitutionally indefensible pro-equal protections article, it's up to us patriots to get the word out about Fx News's liberal spin on 14A's EPC.
“Equality treadmill.” LOL!!!
It’s just fascism, plain and simple. Fascism masquerading as “equality.”