To: i88schwartz
The press in this country is an absolute disgrace.
2 posted on
04/23/2013 5:54:01 AM PDT by
headstamp 2
(What would Scooby do?)
To: i88schwartz
why weren’t they arrested?
3 posted on
04/23/2013 5:55:15 AM PDT by
Homer1
To: i88schwartz
4 posted on
04/23/2013 5:55:20 AM PDT by
Travis McGee
(www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
To: i88schwartz
A “hero of Tucson”?
A bat-sh!t crazy son of Progressive Democrats murdered a conservative judge. What do they mean by “hero”?
5 posted on
04/23/2013 5:56:31 AM PDT by
SatinDoll
(NATURAL BORN CITZEN: BORN IN THE USA OF CITIZEN PARENTS.)
To: i88schwartz
THe corrupt MSM is nothing but a front group for the DNC.
6 posted on
04/23/2013 5:57:30 AM PDT by
Obadiah
(High speed, low drag.)
To: i88schwartz
Does freedom of the press trump obstruction of justice? I don’t know.
7 posted on
04/23/2013 5:57:35 AM PDT by
TheZMan
(Buy more ammo.)
To: i88schwartz
The bravery of our press continues to amaze me </sarcasm>
8 posted on
04/23/2013 5:58:35 AM PDT by
Hurricane Andrew
(There are no evil thoughts except one: the refusal to think.)
To: i88schwartz
Where were the tazers? They needed first hand training.
9 posted on
04/23/2013 6:03:54 AM PDT by
showme_the_Glory
(ILLEGAL: prohibited by law. ALIEN: Owing political allegiance to another country or government)
To: i88schwartz
The choice of term seems imminently appropriate.
Seems almost every time a “Human Shield” is used, it is a rogue regime using it as a tool in the commission of unconscionable criminal acts.
12 posted on
04/23/2013 6:11:10 AM PDT by
Dr.Zoidberg
(John Winthrop's "City upon a Hill" just became a midden heap. Infested with rats and other vermin.)
To: i88schwartz
The MSM motto:
“We make the news so you don’t have to.”
13 posted on
04/23/2013 6:13:19 AM PDT by
Iron Munro
(Welcome to Obama-Land - EVERYTHING NOT FORBIDDEN IS COMPULSORY)
To: i88schwartz
Proud of being a good little propagandist?
I wonder if soviet-era press were as gleefully willing as the current american media.
At least until they were FORCED to say what they were told to say.
14 posted on
04/23/2013 6:14:57 AM PDT by
Mr. K
(There are lies, damned lies, statistics, and democrat talking points.)
To: i88schwartz
What I wouldn’t have paid to see some burly Capitol Hill Police Officer, pick up a couple of these reporters, then face plant them HARD into the marble floor of the Senate Rotunda and slap on the cuffs. Of course the police have probably been warned that the press are “untouchable” and that is why they knew they could be effective human shields.
15 posted on
04/23/2013 6:20:31 AM PDT by
apillar
To: i88schwartz
And the country edges ever closer to revolution.
16 posted on
04/23/2013 6:42:11 AM PDT by
mongo141
(Revolution ver. 2.0, just a matter of when, not a matter of if!)
To: i88schwartz
Anyone forming a “human shield” around someone breaking the law just became an accessory to the crime.
17 posted on
04/23/2013 6:52:20 AM PDT by
Pecos
(If more sane people carried guns, fewer crazies would get off a second shot.)
To: i88schwartz
RYAN GRIM, HUFFINGTON POST: Yeah, and there's nothing in the Second Amendment that says you're entitled to, you know, 50 bullets in a clip. I might consider listening to them when they actually know the basic components of a firearm.
20 posted on
04/23/2013 4:04:18 PM PDT by
matt04
To: i88schwartz
They aren’t journalists.
They’re “Co-Conspirators engaged in criminal trespass.”
Treat them appropriately.
21 posted on
04/23/2013 6:21:42 PM PDT by
Rides_A_Red_Horse
(Why do you need a fire extinguisher when you can call the fire department?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
