Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Katechon
It seems like there is a bit of a catch-22 here. If the constitution was put on hold for national security reasons due to a terrorist attack, then why was this guy read his miranda rights? If he is just some criminal that is going to be tried in federal court, what gave them the right to warrantless searches.

Why does the terrorist have constitutional rights to a trial yet innocent citizens have no right to privacy? Violate the constitutional rights of dozens just to bring one man to justice and afford that man the contitutional rights you circumnevted in his capture?

15 posted on 04/22/2013 11:23:02 PM PDT by douginthearmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: douginthearmy

It’s events like this, with the abuse of law-abiding citizens, that have the whole country arming itself for war. The tension just gets worse and eventually will explode.


16 posted on 04/23/2013 12:10:00 AM PDT by Cololeo (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson