[Monorprise]

“Yeah, but don’t forget the Government was the people, or the Militia back then, they were just getting set up.”

That changes nothing, Massachusetts ‘was and is’ of the people just as much as Washington ‘was and is’. The fact that Washington was then a far more constitutional government does not change the text of that Constitution, nor the fact that the matters were dealt with.

---

“I mentioned up thread that was a good case, maybe that’s why they’re hustling the Saudi connection guy out of the Country.

If they can make that connection, this becomes an act of war, imo.”

You know it’s ironic too because as former Texas prosecutor is currently being brought up on criminal charges for hiding & covering up evidence. Obama and Washington probably have no fear of such repercussions.

[Las Vegas Ron]

That changes nothing, Massachusetts ‘was and is’ of the people just as much as Washington ‘was and is’. The fact that Washington was then a far more constitutional government does not change the text of that Constitution, nor the fact that the matters were dealt with.

I agree. My point was and is, the Government was the people back then. Today, the Government is the people. Look at how the unarmed sheeple were told to stay in their homes and let big daddy take care of it. Back in the day the people would have been called out to handle it.

BTW, a well armed populace (militia) would have negate the militarized show of force deemed necessary to capture a 19 yo punk.

Turns out, citizens in the end facilitated and made happen the capture of said punk.

You know it’s ironic too because as former Texas prosecutor is currently being brought up on criminal charges for hiding & covering up evidence. Obama and Washington probably have no fear of such repercussions.

Which case??