Well, if he did something to revoke his citizenship, then it can be revoked. But, they still have to prove that, right? Since when do conservatives support the idea the government just does whatever it wants, and doesn’t have to follow the law?
I see you’ve been working your way down the thread. Check out post #191. Revoking citizenship is not, nor should be an easy matter. There needs to be some due process.
Trust in the US government is at an all time low, the majority of libertarians, conservatives, moderates and center leftists in this country don’t trust the government to do ANYTHING correctly, let alone handle a socio-political football that is this legal case.
And yeah, I agree with you, but really, between AG Holder, and Carmen Ortiz, U.S. Attorney, Massachusetts, the level of political calculations made in their every prosecutorial decision is so widely disproportionate to anything approaching a reasoned course of action for a civic bureaucrat, I myself have little hope this situation is going to go forward in anything less than a poolarized political media circus.
Ouch! I meant #101. 191 hasn’t happened yet!
Agree, imo that is the first path that should be taken by the prosecution. Hope it is.