Homosexual Activist Admits True Purpose of Battle is to Destroy Marriage

Illinois Family Institute ^ | 4/6/13 | Micah Clark

[Wuli]

You take out the nature of human reproduction, the length of human pregnancy, the length of human infancy & childhood and the incentive from all that for the human family unit and it is hard to imagine that marriage would have been established, and equally hard to imagine marriage as intended for anything else.

The fact that heterosexual couples may marry with no intention of having children or that they may marry knowing they cannot have children changes nothing about why humans established marriage or what marriage is essentially about in spite of the exceptions we recognize.

No we see from this “gay” activist why, after civil partnership laws were successfully established, and established providing a lot of equality under the law with married couples, they proved insufficient to the activists cause.

[Wuli]

as a Libertarian on taxes, I understand that same-sex marriage is unneccessary for resolving tax equality with married couples when it comes to all death taxes

the best solution is that all death taxes should not exist, but barring that event if there are exemptions then the estate should be able to select who among the estate’s beneficiaries will benefit from them

the result of that would be that the estate of most married persons will name the remaining spouse and/or surviving children as rightful claimants to all, or a share, of any death tax exemptions, while everyone else will designate whomever they see fit

this will not result in any dimunition of estate tax exemptions to married couples and their families, but it will expand the same exemptions to others

and demonstrates that “same-sex” marriage is unnecessary for providing an equal share of estate tax exemptions to everyone

[TArcher]

Yep.  Regardless of what pretentious Fithcal Conthervative RINOs would have folks believe is irrelvant, the historical facts can be seen by anyone with common sense:

 

"According to my opinion, and the opinions of many defectors of my caliber, only about 15% of time, money, and manpower is spent on espionage as such. The other 85% is a slow process which we call either ideological subversion, active measures, or psychological warfare. What it basically means is: to change the perception of reality of every American that despite of the abundance of information no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interest of defending themselves, their families, their community, and their country.

 

It's a great brainwashing process which goes very slow and is divided into four basic stages.

 

The first stage being "demoralization".

 

It takes from 15 to 20 years to demoralize a nation. Why that many years? Because this is the minimum number of years required to educate one generation of students in the country of your enemy exposed to the ideology of [their] enemy. In other words, Marxism-Leninism ideology is being pumped into the soft heads of at least 3 generation of American students without being challenged or counterbalanced by the basic values of Americanism; American patriotism.

 

Most of the activity of the department [KGB] was to compile huge amount / volume of information, on individuals who were instrumental in creating public opinion.  Publisher, editors, journalists, uh actors, educationalists, professors of political science.  Members of parliament, representatives of business circles.  "

--KGB Defector Yuri Bezmenov

--Soviet Subversion of the Free Press (Ideological subversion, Destabilization, CRISIS - and the KGB)

 

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2095202/posts

 

 

Dn't need n Weatherman t see which waybama's wind

blws.

 

"Behind the Violence, Says Jane Alpert, Was Sex"

--November 09, 1981--
"The leaders of the Weather Underground, she believes, followed a similar pattern of constantly shifting sexual alliances..."

http://www.people.com/people/archive/article/0,,20080637,00.html

"He [Bill Ayers] also writes about the Weathermen's sexual experimentation as they tried to 'smash monogamy.' The Weathermen were 'an army of lovers,' he says, and describes having had different sexual partners, including his best male friend."

Source: New York Times, September 11, 2001: "No Regrets for a Love Of Explosives; In a Memoir of Sorts, a War Protester Talks of Life With the Weathermen"
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F02E1DE1438F932A2575AC0A9679C8B63&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=1

"...the Weathermen, when not engaged in group sex, committed such revolutionary acts as parading with a Viet Cong flag through a local park on Independence Day and spray-painting the walls of a high school with the slogans, "Off the Pigs," "Viet Cong Will Win," and "F#$k U.S. Imperialism."..."

Campus Wars: The Peace Movement At American State Universities in the Vietnam Era

 

"What happens next bears watching closely, as does the response of the president, ex-Speaker Pelosi, and others on the left.  Encouraged by leftists in the Democratic Party and funded by left-leaning nonprofit organizations and celebrity contributors, Occupy Wall Street may in time morph into something resembling the radical factions of the late 1960s and 1970s."

http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/10/predicting_the_weatherman.html

The Osawatomie Coincidence

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2818309/posts

[TArcher]

You take out the nature of human reproduction, the length of human pregnancy, the length of human infancy & childhood and the incentive from all that for the human family unit and it is hard to imagine that marriage would have been established, and equally hard to imagine marriage as intended for anything else.

 

 

Sex, Evolution and Behavior

By Martin Daly and Margo Wilson

 

 

Got Socio-Biological Fitness?

 

 "Gay" penguins don't - not even in the San Francisco zoo

http://www.google.com/#sclient=psy-ab&hl=en&source=hp&q=San+Francisco+gay+penguins

 

FAIL.

[cardinal4]

"I have three kids who have five parents, more or less, and I don’t see why they shouldn’t have five parents legally… I met my new partner, and she had just had a baby, and that baby’s biological father is my brother, and my daughter’s biological father is a man who lives in Russia, and my adopted son also considers him his father. So the five parents break down into two groups of three… And really, I would like to live in a legal system that is capable of reflecting that reality, and I don’t think that’s compatible with the institution of marriage.”

it's not about the kids with this person, it's the agenda. The kids are just props..

[VRW Conspirator]

Take TN, for example:...

I agree with you. That is the way it should be. But the push will be to get "gay" as a protected class, such as race, color, age, etc. The logic used to get there will make any pretzel proud. I do not underestimate the progressives. At the rate they are going, they will succeed.

[ThisLittleLightofMine]

Thats right no fault divorce and Ronald Reagan signed this into law in California, one of the few problems I have with his politics.

[SuziQ]

I’m against gay marriage but if you really want to know what destroyed marriage, it was no-fault divorce and the 60s sexual “revolution” that made living together and sleeping around OK.

Too sadly true.

[zot]

The destruction of heterosexual marriage is well underway.

[Sun]

& destroy the family, as well:

“children of homosexual fathers are nearly 3 times as likely, and children of lesbian mothers are nearly 4 times as likely, to identify as something other than entirely heterosexual.

Children of lesbian mothers are 75% more likely, and children of homosexual fathers are 3 times more likely, to be currently in a same-sex romantic relationship.”

more http://www.frc.org/issuebrief/new-study-on-homosexual-parents-tops-all-previous-research