You know, if they are NOT the bombers, and there really was a baby in that stroller, they are very close to the site of the blast, and a baby would presumably have been hurt. Now, babies being hurt usually makes the news. Small victims make good headlines, but the youngest victim I’ve heard of is the 8 year old boy who was very, very close in one picture I saw.
Do you think the Feds will pay us for all this legwork?
Under Obamatollah, they’d probably pay us to STOP TRYING to solve this bombing.
I heard briefly on FNC or the radio (sorry, don’t recall which) is that the youngest victim was 2 and the oldest 71 - only heard it once or twice - no other mention of it that I’ve heard (though I haven’t been listening/watching 24/7).
There was a story posted the other day at Time about one of the photographers who was on the scene immediately. He described seeing an overturned stroller right near the blast site, and said he rushed over to check it, but there was no child in it. Could be the same stroller that you’re talking about.
The stroller in the photo (to which I think you’re referring) is of the umbrella stroller type. Personally, if I had a child in an umbrella stroller, I’d probably grab my child and run, and leave the stroller behind. They’re very flimsy. But that’s just me.