To: Sacajaweau
The Arabs (who have great experience in this subject) claim that the ideal number of wives is 3 ,,, two of them will always side against the third and with you ... I would think this is a good arrangement as in the animal kingdom it is usual for males to be underrepresented and to have multiple partners... I would think that increasing the value of the male partner this way would lead to a more equal partnership.
I am all for it as long as it is restricted to one sex being a single with the other sex being multiple ,, no “multi-M/multi-F” arrangements.
13 posted on
04/16/2013 5:36:56 PM PDT by
Neidermeyer
(I used to be disgusted , now I try to be amused.)
To: Neidermeyer
Don't know how you can stop even multi-M/multi-F arrangements once the genie is out of the bottle. Polygamy is far closer to normal than gay marriage and has been used by societies throughout history to deal with a surplus of females. Almost every warring Native American tribe practiced polygamy. The alternatives such female abandonment, femaile infanticide, etc. were far, far worse.
I don't think the lunkheads promoting gay marriage failed to realize this. In fact, I think it was their objective.
22 posted on
04/16/2013 6:57:25 PM PDT by
Vigilanteman
(Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
To: Neidermeyer
I am all for it as long as it is restricted to one sex being a single with the other sex being multiple Who are you to impose your outdated "morality" on me, huh?
Yes, it's sarcasm
31 posted on
04/17/2013 5:14:33 AM PDT by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson