Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Here's a thought: Maybe they were wrong?
1 posted on 04/16/2013 8:46:53 AM PDT by Moseley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Moseley
NOTE that REUTERS requires an excerpt. For the full article -- including the hogwash trying to explain away the facts -- you have to go to: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/04/16/us-climate-slowdown-idUSBRE93F0AJ20130416
2 posted on 04/16/2013 8:47:55 AM PDT by Moseley (http://www.curesocialism.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

The only problem with the gorebal warming fiasco is that if they pray for things to heat up nothing will happen.

God doesn’t listen to or grant the prayerful requests of fools whose only goal is to ruin civilization.

On the other hand, Satan listens to them as he listens to the entire political miasma. Any time their wishes are granted it’s strictly by accident.


3 posted on 04/16/2013 8:50:08 AM PDT by IbJensen (Liberals are like Slinkies, good for nothing, but you smile as you push them down the stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

I guess they are searching for some anomoly so they can continue their mission to seek funds to further support their theory.

I give Rush credit on this when he said consensus is not settled science. Of course unless it is something from the left. If we say Radical Islam is an enemy and severe threat to the western world, the left says that is not settled regardless of the consensus saying it is.


4 posted on 04/16/2013 8:50:46 AM PDT by Mouton (108th MI Group.....68-71)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

One can only imagine what Sheldon Cooper would say about the climate clowns.


5 posted on 04/16/2013 8:50:49 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

“Getting this right is essential for the short and long-term planning of governments and businesses ranging from energy to construction, from agriculture to insurance. Many scientists say they expect a revival of warming in coming years. “

They have no idea why it “slowed” but they expect a revival soon. Got it.


6 posted on 04/16/2013 8:53:16 AM PDT by headstamp 2 (What would Scooby do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

It was the Ocean, see, the ocean, it swallowed up all the heat, then, no, it was the aerosols from Chinese power plants, yeah, that’s the ticket, it was the Chinese, see, the Chinese did it, with all their power plants. And it’s worse, see. So now I think I got, we got it right this time, see?


7 posted on 04/16/2013 8:57:11 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Doing the same thing and expecting different results is called software engineering.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

Here’s another: Maybe they aren’t scientists.


9 posted on 04/16/2013 9:01:46 AM PDT by 556x45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

Global Warming scientists struggle to keep the lie going....


10 posted on 04/16/2013 9:02:34 AM PDT by Tzimisce (The American Revolution began when the British attempted to disarm the Colonists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley
It's

Bush's

Sarah Palin's

The Tea Party's

Right-Wing Extremist's

The GOP's

not our

fault!

13 posted on 04/16/2013 9:11:39 AM PDT by FroggyTheGremlim (Palin was correct!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

No real scientist is ever dismayed by new data, nor does he feel threatened by the prospect of having to modify a theory. Political activists, however, are.


14 posted on 04/16/2013 9:14:08 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley
Climate scientist, "x+2=5, therefore manmade global warming"

Critics, "We just examined 'x' and quantified it as being 5"

Climate scientist "x+2-2=5, therfore manmade global warming"

17 posted on 04/16/2013 9:27:56 AM PDT by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley
Here's a thought: Maybe they were wrong?

There comes a point in the evolution of any scientific hoax when the perpetrators have too much invested to ever feel safe admitting the truth of what they've done. Besides, well earned though it may be, the destruction of their professional reputations would be unbearable. Most of them will cling to this fraud to their dying breath.

19 posted on 04/16/2013 9:57:55 AM PDT by katana (Just my opinions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

Our precious bodily fluids are absorbing the heat and it is destroying them!

22 posted on 04/16/2013 10:53:03 AM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

Reuters! Doubt is gaining momentum.


27 posted on 04/16/2013 9:25:39 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

Fog removed:

Propagandists are struggling to explain the total lack ofclimate change that has exposed manipulation in their data and exposes a lack of their imaginary global greenhouse gas emissions.

Often focused on misrepresenting century-long trends, most climate models failed to predict that the temperature rise would stop around 1934. Propagandists are now intent on figuring out the cause of the 79 years of continuous cooling and determining whether the cooling will be brief or a more lasting phenomenon.

Getting this scam right is essential for the short and long-term disruption of businesses ranging from energy to construction, from agriculture to insurance. Many propagandists say they’re praying for a revival of warming in coming years.

Theories for the pause include that deep oceans have taken up more heat with the result that the surface is cooler than expected, that industrial pollution in Asia or clouds are blocking the sun, or that greenhouse gases trap less heat than previously believed.

The change may be a result of an observed decline in heat-trapping water vapor in the high atmosphere, for unknown reasons. It could be a combination of factors or some as yet unknown natural variations, scientists say.

Nonexistant economic growth and the total lack of warming is undermining governments’ willingness to make a strupid billion-dollar shift from fossil fuels to fairy dust.


28 posted on 04/17/2013 12:20:59 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson