Your "credibility" is linked to a speculative newspaper article? Agenda related, maybe?
From the article you linked..:
... About 90 percent of U.S. wells, and almost all in Colorado, are hydrofractured or fracked by forcing a mixture of water, sand and trace chemicals into a well to crack rock and release oil and gas. Industry executives and state regulators, including Colorado regulators, have said there were no documented cases of fracking directly polluting groundwater....
The EPA study "gives a probability, not a conclusion, said Douglas Hock, a spokesman for Calgary-based Encana Corp., the operator in the Pavillion field.
The origin of the chemicals is still not certain, Hock said....
>>Agenda related, maybe?
As opposed to the (not)agenda-driven resting of the credibility of one’s “little community” upon a sandy claim by the (D)imowit governor that he drank Fracking Fluid. Uhuh.
When does Governor Chickenlooper plan on having Fracking Fluid on tap at the Wynkoop brewery?
“State regulators say at least 84,000 gallons of water contaminated with oil and chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing spilled from a broken well-head in a field about 4 miles north of Windsor.”
http://www.denverpost.com/environment/ci_22586154/water-fouled-fracking-chemicals-spews-near-windsor
Please point out the above facts that are “speculative”?