Thank you for your note.
While I cannot speak for the moderators, Free Republic’s policy is to forbid advocacy of violence. I agree with that policy for a number of reasons.
Having said that, I wasn’t aware of Chuck Baldwin’s view on this issue and I will do the research on my own.
The gist of Baldwin’s argument in the expunged link was that the Constitution is the lawful authority, not the official, in our country. He was saying that citing Romans 13 as an excuse to do nothing but submit, is lame. I don’t think he was advocating violence. Although if someone were to bomb Pearl Harbor tomorrow, I believe he might.
More than two thousand died at Pearl Harbor. Some 50 million Americans have been slaughtered by abortionists. I would call any violence against that an act of national defense, but...
(Mod, can you tell me why the post was removed so I won’t make that mistake again? Thanks.)
“Free Republic’s policy is to forbid advocacy of violence”
Just this morning I saw numerous comments about nuking muslims: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3007922/posts (posts 5, 6, 8, 10, 11)
NTTAWWT! :)