Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MakuluNyoka

Again, how a people want to conduct their internal affairs and order their society and economy is their own business.

Muslim treatment of women today is just as egregious all over the Middle and Far East as well. Shall we invade their countries and take control of the oil wells because “we can run it better?”

“We can run it better,” which ALWAYS translates to “we can make a lot of money,” is no justification for stealing land and resources and enslaving the native population.

You might argue that South Africans weren’t “enslaved” in that they couldn’t be bought and sold... officially. I would argue there’s precious little difference between serfdom — your rights are stripped away and delegated back by the King at his pleasure — and slavery.

How Americans can support theft and slavery in Africa in 2013 is beyond me.


127 posted on 04/14/2013 9:56:08 AM PDT by Blue Ink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]


To: Blue Ink

Still no facts. Just revisionistic theory and conjecture. As far as Muslims go, I’m not surprised you used them in an analogy since the liberals practically french kiss Sharia Law and you are doing your best trying not to be “outed.”

Consider changing your screen name to “Blue State/Red Ink”

Progressive shill alert!


130 posted on 04/14/2013 12:40:49 PM PDT by AbolishCSEU (Percentage of Income in CS is inversely proportionate to Mother's parenting of children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson