Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DakotaGator
Actually, there are a couple of more things ~ one of them is that Freight does not have the same time and comfort constraints required for humans and therefore can spend more time sitting on a siding and ride on rougher rails.

Since freight traffic is going to pay for rail upkeep and force scheduling, passenger rail systems can never share the same right of way as freight! And, without rails, passenger rail systems will need ENORMOUS SUBSIDIES forever ~ plus, competing forms of transportation (personal automobiles, and airplanes) are more comfortable than the best rail passenger system under any conditions.

I'm betting on AUTOMATED AUTOMOBILES and an entirely new concept of transportation. These devices will turn into a utility.

18 posted on 04/13/2013 12:26:25 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah

How do you explain the current passenger routes sharing rights of way with freight now?


19 posted on 04/13/2013 12:32:45 PM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: muawiyah

My rule of thumb was that freight made the expenses, mail made the profit, and passengers made the cake.

Of course, government cannot understand any of that.


34 posted on 04/13/2013 5:20:50 PM PDT by DakotaGator (Weep for the lost Republic! And keep your powder dry!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson