Skip to comments.
9 Reasons Why Ann Coulter Is “That Friend”
Conservatives4Palin ^
| April 12, 2013
| Michelle McCormick
Posted on 04/13/2013 6:23:10 AM PDT by Bratch
#9: She makes up stories that are easily disproved
#8: She always brings along That Guy as her date
#6: Shes always trying to sell you stuff that you dont want
#4 She is incredibly jealous of your other female friends and picks fights with them
#3: She has crushes on the weirdest guys.
#2: She never apologizes for her bad behavior
#1: You wonder why you even became friends with her in the first place
TOPICS: News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: coulter; sharkjumping
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
1
posted on
04/13/2013 6:23:10 AM PDT
by
Bratch
To: Bratch
2
posted on
04/13/2013 6:25:05 AM PDT
by
2banana
(My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
To: 2banana
Waking up with a hangover sucks.
:)
3
posted on
04/13/2013 6:27:17 AM PDT
by
Salamander
(Like acid and oil on a madman's face, reason tends to fly away.....)
To: Bratch
I liked her up until she fawned over Romney before Romney was even close to being being nominated.
She is one flawed lady
4
posted on
04/13/2013 6:31:15 AM PDT
by
Vaquero
(Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
To: Bratch
We should clearly spend our time going after Ann Coulter since there are no more pressing issues.
5
posted on
04/13/2013 6:36:06 AM PDT
by
EEGator
To: Vaquero
Yeah—we should all be so flawed........
6
posted on
04/13/2013 6:37:36 AM PDT
by
basil
(basil, 2ASisters.org)
To: Bratch
#5 and #6 aren’t really faults. It IS very difficult to lock up crazy people before they act out, and the Megan McCain crack was hilarious, and right on point. Ann is very flawed, but our side needs punchers, and she is one.
7
posted on
04/13/2013 6:37:56 AM PDT
by
cdcdawg
To: EEGator
She picked a loser. Some of us saw that years ago. Most of you still think Romney could have won.
Frankly, when you have a candidate who doesn't start campaigning coming out the chute of the nomination he's probably not going to win.
8
posted on
04/13/2013 6:39:10 AM PDT
by
muawiyah
Comment #9 Removed by Moderator
To: muawiyah
I’m not “most of you”. I’m pointing out there are more pressing issues.
10
posted on
04/13/2013 6:40:08 AM PDT
by
EEGator
Comment #11 Removed by Moderator
To: 2banana
I am guessing that this thread is in response to Miss Coulter’s boorish and untimely attack against Governor Palin, whom Coulter falsely accused of having been snubbed by Baroness Thatcher for speaking poor English.
The truth, which Miss Coulter neglected to mention, is that the Iron Lady was in such frail and declining health that she could receive few visitors around the time Governor Palin visited the U.K.
To: EEGator
She made herself part of the topic called 'more pressing issues' when she encouraged the GOP to commit political suicide.
That rather undermined her other stuff.
We are concerned!
13
posted on
04/13/2013 6:42:26 AM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: cdcdawg
It's always a mistake to bring up Meghan McCain, and that's what Meghan did ~ again.
Good that Coulter tossed it back at her and her running dog lackeys ~ Ann gets in the news ~ most of us don't ~ except in footnotes in doctoral theses written by brain damaged leftwingtards.
14
posted on
04/13/2013 6:45:20 AM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: EEGator
To: muawiyah
She has one vote, and is becoming less relevant by the day.
You may have the last comment.
16
posted on
04/13/2013 6:55:31 AM PDT
by
EEGator
To: cdcdawg
Which side has Coulter chosen to punch?
Her comments against Gov. Palin, also insinuating that Baroness Thatcher was of poor character, were both false and disgusting. And the timing was horribly rude—the day the Iron Lady died, I believe.
To: EEGator
Voegelin's:
"The problem of an eidos in history, hence, arises only when a Christian transcendental fulfillment becomes immanentized. Such an immanentist hypostasis of the eschaton, however, is a theoretical fallacy."
18
posted on
04/13/2013 7:06:01 AM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: muawiyah
She picked a loser. Some of us saw that years ago. Most of you still think Romney could have won.
Frankly, when you have a candidate who doesn't start campaigning coming out the chute of the nominationn he's probably not going to win. I'm thinking if Romney had won and then sandy hook had happened the republicans would have given us complete and utter gun confiscation by now. At least now there is some partisanship...for what that's worth.
19
posted on
04/13/2013 7:11:08 AM PDT
by
Vaquero
(Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
To: Vaquero
Let me get down in the gutter on that one ~ if Romney had won the Democrats wouldn't have bothered planning the whole attack at Newtown ~ they'd ran with their attack in Colorado, and maybe Arizona and been happy.
He'd been happy to accommodate their need to oppress the innocent and punish the harmless.
20
posted on
04/13/2013 7:14:32 AM PDT
by
muawiyah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson