So can you at least understand why skeptics of speciation via microevolution do not take kindly to being labeled as ignorant?
So your view is that every single species fit on the Ark? How did the marsupials almost all end up in Australia?
Why do evolutionists always have to create straw men or false dichotomies?
My answer is "I don't know," and "I don't know." I don't know the science well enough to say. And I don't really care very much. God got us here however He got us here.
This does not mean, however, that speciation via microevolution is true. This is not a dichotomy. My analysis of the evidence is similar to yours. It doesn't seem to.
So do you understand why throwing your hands up and saying “I don’t know” is not as useful and predictable or as satisfactory as an actual explanation based upon the evidence?
One thing the fossil record clearly does NOT show is that all species existed contemporaneously. So how is it that you accept the evidence of their long existence in the past without major change (say in three toed horses), but reject the evidence that those horses with toes didn’t live contemporaneously with horses with hooves?