[Mrs. Don-o]

She's clearly not refusing service to them because of their sexual orientation. The article clearly states that both of these men had been her customers for years. She presumably had sold them both flowers regardless of their personal sexual arousal pattern.

If they had sent their straight friend over to place the order for the flowers, she would have still declined because it was for an activity --- not a disfavored person, but an activity --- she could not morally support.

It had nothing to do with any animus against the individual person who came to the counter.

[BykrBayb]

That’s what I was trying to say. You said it so much better.

: )

[Eepsy]

Not to mention the fact that for a wedding, the florist would usually go to the church for the set-up and breakdown of arrangements. That was probably too involved for her comfort.